<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digitivity &#187; benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitivity.org/tag/benchmark/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitivity.org</link>
	<description>The Digital Productivity Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>CPU Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://digitivity.org/1131/cpu-benchmarks</link>
		<comments>http://digitivity.org/1131/cpu-benchmarks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digitivity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpubenchmark.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitivity.org/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://digitivity.org/tumblog/links">Links</a></p><p><a href="http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html" rel="bookmark" title="CPU Benchmarks" target="_blank">http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html</a></p>Remember when there were only a few CPU families in the old day? 486, Pentium, Pentium Pro, then the P4? It was easy to know which CPU was faster than which. Now it&#8217;s crazy hard. That&#8217;s where cpubenchmark.com comes in. They give you a graph of CPU performance as well as the price. Related posts:Firefox [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://digitivity.org/146/firefox-31-beta-has-new-faster-tracemonkey-javascript-engine' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Firefox 3.1 Beta Has New, Faster TraceMonkey Javascript Engine'>Firefox 3.1 Beta Has New, Faster TraceMonkey Javascript Engine</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when there were only a few CPU families in the old day? 486, Pentium, Pentium Pro, then the P4? It was easy to know which CPU was faster than which.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://digitivity.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/cpubenchmark.png" align="none"></p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s crazy hard. That&#8217;s where <a href="http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html">cpubenchmark.com</a> comes in. They give you a graph of CPU performance as well as the price.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://digitivity.org/146/firefox-31-beta-has-new-faster-tracemonkey-javascript-engine' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Firefox 3.1 Beta Has New, Faster TraceMonkey Javascript Engine'>Firefox 3.1 Beta Has New, Faster TraceMonkey Javascript Engine</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitivity.org/1131/cpu-benchmarks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.1 Beta Has New, Faster TraceMonkey Javascript Engine</title>
		<link>http://digitivity.org/146/firefox-31-beta-has-new-faster-tracemonkey-javascript-engine</link>
		<comments>http://digitivity.org/146/firefox-31-beta-has-new-faster-tracemonkey-javascript-engine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digitivity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software and Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TraceMonkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitivity.org/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://digitivity.org/category/audience/developer" title="Developer">Developer</a><a href="http://digitivity.org/category/software-and-downloads" title="Software and Downloads">Software and Downloads</a></p>InfoPackets reports that the Firefox 3.1 beta is getting faster at JavaScript and CSS rendering. It&#8217;s going to need it for upcoming competition from Google Chrome and Microsoft IE. But the original article&#8216;s test numbers aren&#8217;t quite promising. While Firefox 3.1 may be faster than previous Firefox versions, it&#8217;s still slower than the current Safari [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://digitivity.org/1148/feather-beta-how-make-slow-youtube-faster-speed' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Feather Beta: How to Make YouTube Faster'>Feather Beta: How to Make YouTube Faster</a></li>
<li><a href='http://digitivity.org/441/google-chrome-browser-third-place-behind-internet-explorer-and-firefox' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google Chrome Browser Third Place Behind Internet Explorer and Firefox'>Google Chrome Browser Third Place Behind Internet Explorer and Firefox</a></li>
<li><a href='http://digitivity.org/52/firefox-305-released' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Firefox 3.0.5 Released'>Firefox 3.0.5 Released</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.infopackets.com/">InfoPackets</a> <a href="http://www.infopackets.com/news/internet/2009/20090305_firefox_beta_touts_advanced_engine_solves_8_flaws.htm">reports</a> that the Firefox 3.1 beta is getting faster at JavaScript and CSS rendering. It&#8217;s going to need it for upcoming competition from Google Chrome and Microsoft IE.</p>
<p>But the <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Firefox-31-could-catch-up-to-Safari-4-in-beta-speed-duel/1236203202">original article</a>&#8216;s test numbers aren&#8217;t quite promising. While Firefox 3.1 may be faster than previous Firefox versions, it&#8217;s still slower than the current Safari beta.</p>
<ul>
<li> <strong><a href="http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/csstest.html" target="_blank">HowToCreate.co.uk CSS rendering benchmark</a></strong>: Firefox 3.1 beta loads in 456 ms and renders in 38 ms.  Safari 4 beta loads in an amazing 54 ms and renders in 7 ms.</li>
<li><a href="http://celtickane.com/webdesign/jsspeed2007.php"><strong>Sean Patrick Kane&#8217;s JavaScript test</strong></a>: 344 ms for Firefox and 174 for Safari.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://acid3.acidtests.org/" target="_blank">Acid3 standards compliance test</a></strong>: 93 for Firefox and 100 for Safari.</li>
</ul>
<p>Sorry to say, but this is really pathetic performance. Here&#8217;s hoping the Firefox devs can bring their game up by release time.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://digitivity.org/1148/feather-beta-how-make-slow-youtube-faster-speed' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Feather Beta: How to Make YouTube Faster'>Feather Beta: How to Make YouTube Faster</a></li>
<li><a href='http://digitivity.org/441/google-chrome-browser-third-place-behind-internet-explorer-and-firefox' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google Chrome Browser Third Place Behind Internet Explorer and Firefox'>Google Chrome Browser Third Place Behind Internet Explorer and Firefox</a></li>
<li><a href='http://digitivity.org/52/firefox-305-released' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Firefox 3.0.5 Released'>Firefox 3.0.5 Released</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitivity.org/146/firefox-31-beta-has-new-faster-tracemonkey-javascript-engine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: digitivity.org @ 2012-05-22 16:27:45 -->
